Index
← Advocacy Organizations

Beagle Freedom Project

Rescue & Legislation501(c)(3)Valley Village, CA · Founded December 2010

“Educate. Legislate. Liberate.” — The most beagle-specific organization in the animal advocacy ecosystem, operating rescue, adoption, and state-by-state legislative campaigns to free dogs from laboratories.

2010
Founded
Origin: 2 beagles from a CA lab
16
States with beagle freedom laws
Animal Legal & Historical Center, 2025
$2.56M
FY2024 revenue
89.5% from contributions
95%
Charity Navigator score
Four-star rating

Organization Overview

The Beagle Freedom Project (BFP) traces its origin to December 2010, when a California research laboratory asked ARME (Animal Rescue, Media & Education, founded 2003) to take two “experimentally spent” beagles. ARME's founder, Shannon Keith — an attorney and documentary filmmaker — agreed. The video of those two beagles taking their first steps on grass went viral, and BFP was born as a distinct project within ARME. The organization later rebranded as “Rescue + Freedom Project” in 2019 before reverting to the Beagle Freedom Project name.

BFP is the only national nonprofit whose entire mission centers on beagles and other animals used in laboratory testing. The name itself is the brand. Unlike broader animal welfare organizations that address lab animals as one issue among many, BFP treats laboratory rescue and post-research adoption as its core identity. The organization is tax-exempt under EIN 55-0882647 (predecessor entity tax-exempt since December 2004), headquartered at 4804 Laurel Canyon Blvd #534, Valley Village, CA 91607, with an animal care facility in Nowata, Oklahoma.

BFP states it has “sister organizations” in France (BFP France) and Australia (BFP Australia), with an effort underway to establish BFP UK, building an international network of rescue affiliates focused on laboratory animals.

Legislative Achievements: Beagle Freedom Laws

Key Finding
BFP's signature achievement: “Right to Release” / “Beagle Freedom Bill” laws requiring laboratories to offer healthy dogs and cats for adoption after studies conclude. As of 2025, 16 states have enacted such laws (per the Animal Legal & Historical Center at Michigan State University). BFP claims credit as the driving force behind this model policy.
The Model: State-by-State Strategy
BFP pioneered a state-by-state approach: draft model legislation with narrow, bipartisan scope; identify sympathetic legislators; mobilize local supporters for testimony and constituent pressure; then move to the next state. The laws do not reduce the number of animals used in experiments but create a post-study adoption pathway, increase public visibility of lab animal use, and establish the legal principle that labs have an obligation to rehome healthy animals. The bipartisan framing is critical: BFP positions the bills as common-sense adoption measures rather than anti-research legislation.
16 States with Enacted Laws

Minnesota (2014, earliest) · Nevada (2015) · New York (2016) · Rhode Island (2018) · Washington (2019) · Oregon (2020, with unique annual reporting requirement) · New Jersey (2020, “Homes for Animal Heroes Act”) · Virginia (2021)

California · Connecticut · Delaware · Illinois · Iowa · Maryland (amended 2023) · Massachusetts (effective 2022) · Michigan (“Teddy's Law,” effective Feb. 2024)

Each state's scope varies: some cover only dogs and cats, others include additional species; some mandate release, others merely encourage it; some apply only to publicly funded institutions.
Enforcement Gap & Unfinished Work
BFP reported pursuing bills in Colorado, Indiana, Texas, and Wisconsin in 2022 — none appear among the enacted laws as of the 2025 map. A broader limitation: the statutes generally require labs to “offer” animals for adoption rather than mandating transfer, and enforcement mechanisms vary. Labs that decline to comply face limited consequences in many states. BFP urges supporters to press NIH for a federal rehoming policy to close these gaps.
Full beagle freedom laws analysis →

Rescue Operations

BFP states it has “liberated thousands of animals” since 2010. The organization operates a multi-step foster-to-adoption pipeline and maintains a dedicated animal care facility in Nowata, Oklahoma. Below are the documented rescue events with verifiable details.

Origin Rescue (December 2010)
Two beagles from a California research laboratory. The viral video of their first outdoor steps became BFP's most effective fundraising and awareness tool for over a decade. Every subsequent rescue is framed as a continuation of this founding story.
“Spanish 40” (November 2011)
Forty beagles rescued from a Spanish laboratory. BFP describes this as a key milestone through which adopters first learned about the organization and its capacity for international rescue logistics. This demonstrated BFP's willingness to operate across borders early in its history.
Oklahoma Lab Shutdown (March 5, 2024)
Approximately 200 animals rescued from a shuttered testing laboratory in Nowata, Oklahoma. BFP describes “shutting down a massive testing laboratory” and used its nearby Nowata facility to stage intake and rehoming. This represented BFP's largest single operation — from two beagles in 2010 to hundreds in a single event — and its first facility acquisition/closure.
Foster & Adoption Pipeline

BFP's adoption process is structured and multi-step: application review, phone interview, virtual home check, reference checks, placement agreement signing, coordinated pickup logistics, and ongoing rescue-team support through the foster period.

Requirements: Minimum age 21. Ability to transport foster animals to vet appointments. Commitment to cruelty-free purchasing. Willingness to act as a “BFP ambassador” by sharing the animal's story publicly. BFP emphasizes that lab survivors often begin fearful and unfamiliar with basic experiences but “blossom into the most loving companions.”

Data Gap
BFP's public pages do not provide auditable, numeric success rates (e.g., adoption-to-return ratio, long-term retention measures, or standardized outcomes by cohort). The closest statement is qualitative: BFP states it places survivors “into loving, adoptive homes across the globe.”

Identity Campaigns: Open Cages, Naming Names

BFP uses individualized identity and storytelling as central tools for both rescue placement and public advocacy. Multiple elements of the organization embed this approach:

From Lab Codes to Names
BFP's “Open Cages, Naming Names” campaign replaces laboratory ear tattoo codes and identification numbers with individual names and stories. Each rescued animal is given a personal narrative that connects their laboratory history to their new life. Fosters are expected to serve as “BFP ambassadors” by sharing each animal's story publicly, linking personal narrative to community education and awareness.
Microchip Scanning & Lab Identity Documentation
BFP encourages adopters and rescue organizations to scan microchips and document laboratory identifiers (ear tattoos, microchip registrations) as evidence of an animal's research history. This documentation serves dual purposes: verifying the animal's origin for adopters and building a public record of which laboratories release animals, creating accountability pressure on facilities.
Viral Origin Story as Template
BFP attributes its entire organizational birth to a specific story: two beagles whose “first steps of freedom went viral.” This identifiable-victim narrative became the template for all subsequent campaigns. The FY2024 revenue of $2.56M — with 89.5% from contributions — is consistent with a donor-driven model where storytelling and identity campaigns are operationally essential.

Media & Public Awareness

Shannon Keith's background as a documentary filmmaker shapes BFP's media-first approach. The organization leverages visual storytelling — viral rescue videos, before-and-after adoption footage, and lab documentation imagery — as primary tools for public engagement. The founding viral video of two beagles experiencing grass for the first time remains BFP's most recognizable media artifact more than a decade later.

BFP's advocacy claims include statements that “more than 60,000 dogs” and “nearly 20,000 cats” are used for experimentation in the U.S. annually, and that “nearly 96%” of dogs used are beagles. These figures appear on BFP's State Beagle Bill page and are used to frame the scale of the problem for supporters and legislators.

BFP's website navigation includes dedicated federal-policy pages for the FDA Modernization Act, the Humane Cosmetics Act of 2023, and a “Federal Beagle Bill,” signaling engagement priorities and positioning BFP as a resource hub for supporters tracking federal legislation.

Federal Policy Engagement

NIH Rehoming Policy
BFP directly urges Congress to require the National Institutes of Health to implement a “Research Animal Adoption Policy for all publicly funded animal experimentation.” This represents a push to federalize the state-level model BFP has championed.
Lobbying as Organizational Function
BFP's executive director job description lists “advocacy campaigns” and “lobbying efforts” as top-level responsibilities alongside fiscal management and staff oversight — indicating lobbying is treated as a core organizational function, not a side activity.
Methodology Caveat
BFP's precise role in specific federal enactments (e.g., FDA Modernization Act 2.0) cannot be verified from public sources alone. Congressional hearing records and coalition letters explicitly naming BFP were not found in the materials reviewed. The strongest evidence of BFP's impact is at the state level, where its “signature legislation” branding is well-documented.

Key People

Shannon Keith
President & Founder · Compensation: $170,736 (FY2024 Form 990)
Attorney and documentary filmmaker who founded ARME in 2003, then launched BFP in December 2010 after the founding beagle rescue. Keith's legal background shaped BFP's legislative-first strategy, and her filmmaking experience established the organization's media-driven identity. Quoted alongside other advocacy leaders in a 2025 Center for a Humane Economy coalition statement on NIH beagle testing.
Carla Naden
Board Chair · Compensation: $0 (FY2024 Form 990)
Board chair overseeing organizational governance. No further public biographical details available in the sources reviewed.
Mando Dorame
Secretary · Compensation: $0 (FY2024 Form 990)
Board secretary. No further public biographical details available in the sources reviewed.

Financials & Governance

FY2024 (ending June 2024, filed May 15, 2025)
$2.56M
Revenue
89.5% contributions, 6.8% program, 3.8% investment
$2.28M
Expenses
Exec comp: $171,889 (7.5%)
$3.97M
Net Assets
Total assets: $4.15M / Liabilities: $177K
$285K
Net Income
Revenue exceeded expenses
Governance Indicators (Charity Navigator)

Overall score: 95% (Four-Star rating)

Independent board majority: 66% independent members (full credit)

Independent board size: 2 independent members (below Charity Navigator benchmark)

Material diversion of assets: None reported

Professional fundraising fees: $0 reported

Governance policies: Conflict-of-interest, whistleblower, and document retention policies in place

Criticisms & Limitations

Small Board Concentration
Charity Navigator flags that while 66% of board members are independent (meeting its threshold), the absolute count of 2 independent members is below its benchmark. A small board concentrated around the founder raises standard governance questions about oversight independence, though no material diversion of assets has been reported.
Enforcement Weakness of State Laws
BFP's legislative model, while successful in passing laws in 16 states, faces a structural limitation: most statutes require labs to “offer” animals for adoption but do not mandate transfer. Enforcement mechanisms vary widely, and labs that decline to comply face limited consequences in many jurisdictions. The laws are more aspirational than compulsory in practice.
Federal Impact Unverified
BFP's website prominently features federal legislation (FDA Modernization Act, Humane Cosmetics Act, Federal Beagle Bill), but congressional hearing records and coalition letters explicitly naming BFP were not found in publicly available materials. The extent of BFP's federal influence remains undocumented.
Outcome Data Absent
BFP does not publish auditable rescue outcome metrics (adoption-to-return ratios, long-term retention, cohort tracking). While the organization states it has “liberated thousands,” the total number and outcomes remain unverifiable from public sources. No financial controversies, enforcement actions, or substantiated fraud findings have been reported in watchdog sources.

Coalition Connections

A 2025 Center for a Humane Economy coalition statement on NIH beagle testing included quotes from Shannon Keith (BFP), Rebekah Robinson (Dane4Dogs), and Wayne Hsiung (Simple Heart) — evidence of coordinated messaging across the advocacy ecosystem.

BFP's operational model depends on community rescue ecosystems for placement logistics. Many state beagle freedom laws explicitly enable transfers to rescue organizations, shelters, and humane societies, creating inter-organizational handoffs as part of compliance. BFP's state legislation framework has been adopted by local groups including Dane4Dogs for Wisconsin's proposed Beagle Freedom Bill (SB 414 / AB 436).

Timeline

2003
Shannon Keith founds ARME (Animal Rescue, Media & Education)
Dec 2004
Predecessor entity receives tax-exempt status (EIN 55-0882647)
Dec 2010
BFP born: two beagles rescued from California lab; viral video launched the organization
Nov 2011
"Spanish 40" rescue — 40 beagles from a Spanish laboratory
2014
Minnesota enacts first beagle freedom law (earliest in the 16-state map)
2015
Nevada enacts research animal adoption law
2016
New York enacts research dog/cat adoption law
2018
Rhode Island passes Research Animal Retirement Act
2019
Washington State enacts adoption law; BFP rebrands as "Rescue + Freedom Project"
2020
Oregon (with reporting requirement) and New Jersey ("Homes for Animal Heroes Act") enacted
2021
Virginia enacts adoption law for research animals
2022
Massachusetts law effective; BFP launches "Open Cages, Naming Names" campaign; pursues bills in CO, IN, TX, WI
Feb 2024
Michigan's "Teddy's Law" takes effect
Mar 2024
Oklahoma lab shutdown: ~200 animals rescued from Nowata facility
2025
16 states with enacted laws (Animal Legal & Historical Center map); coalition statement with Dane4Dogs and Simple Heart on NIH testing

Sources

[1] BFP Mission Page — bfp.org/mission/

[2] ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, EIN 55-0882647 — projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/550882647

[3] Charity Navigator Rating — charitynavigator.org/ein/550882647

[4] BFP State Beagle Bill Page — bfp.org/state/

[5] Animal Legal & Historical Center, Michigan State University — Map of Research Dogs and Cats Adoption Laws (2025) — animallaw.info/content/map-beagle-freedom-laws

[6] BFP Oklahoma Rescue Report (March 5, 2024) — bfp.org/2024/03/05/

[7] BFP Foster Page — bfp.org/foster/

[8] BFP Rescue / Adoption Page — bfp.org/rescue/

[9] BFP Careers Page — bfp.org/jobs/

[10] BFP Executive Director Job Description (PDF) — bfp.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/BFP-Executive-Director.pdf

[11] Individual state statute compilations via Animal Legal & Historical Center (CA, CT, DE, IA, IL, MA, MD, MI, MN, NJ, NV, NY, OR, RI, VA, WA)