Index
← Back to Investigations

The HSUS Undercover Investigation at Charles River Mattawan

Nearly 100 days inside a Michigan testing lab exposed beagles force-fed pesticides — and triggered a chain reaction from viral video to corporate capitulation to a trade-secrets lawsuit.

Concluded2018–2019HSUS
~100
days undercover
Apr–Aug 2018
Source: HSUS
36
beagles in pesticide study
1-year toxicity test
Source: HSUS / Michigan Public
310K+
petition signatures
By Mar 19, 2019
Source: Regional reporting
32
beagles adopted
Via Michigan Humane Society
Source: Local media
Why This Matters
The Mattawan investigation is significant for three reasons: it produced one of the fastest corporate reversals in animal-testing history (sponsor ended the study within days of the video release); it demonstrated the power of a single viral video to force an outcome that regulatory processes had not; and it spawned a rare trade-secrets lawsuit by a biotech client against the CRO — raising novel questions about undercover access in contract research facilities.

The Investigation

The Humane Society of the United States placed an undercover investigator inside Charles River's Mattawan, Michigan facility for “nearly 100 days” between April and August 2018. The investigator documented “nearly two dozen” experiments involving dogs.

On March 12, 2019, HSUS publicly released video and related materials. The press release named four entities whose work was depicted: Dow AgroSciences, Corteva Agriscience, Paredox Therapeutics, and Above and Beyond NB, LLC.

What Was Filmed

Force-feeding / dosing
Beagles in a one-year pesticide study dosed daily. HSUS alleged doses so high that multiple capsules had to be pushed down dogs’ throats.
Confinement
Dogs confined in laboratory cages for extended periods. Barren conditions with no enrichment documented.
End-of-study killing
Dogs killed at conclusion of studies. HSUS’s narrative prominently featured a beagle identified as "Harvey" including scenes before euthanasia/necropsy.
Invasive procedures
Surgical scarring, handling procedures, and dogs used by workers to practice force-feeding and blood collection techniques.
Drug and device testing
Beyond pesticides, dogs used in testing of drugs and medical devices across nearly two dozen separate experiments.
The Adavelt connection
Pesticide identified as Corteva’s fungicide Adavelt® (florylpicoxamid). Testing linked to Brazil market registration requirements.

Video Release & Viral Impact

Mar 12, 2019
HSUS releases video and press materials via GlobeNewswire. Framed as exposing "plight of dogs in a laboratory being dosed with pesticides."
Mar 13, 2019
Michigan Public reports on the facility, names the Adavelt fungicide. Regional coverage spreads rapidly.
Mid-Mar 2019
HSUS petition reaches 100,000+ signatures. YouTube video on trajectory to exceed 200,000 views.
Mar 18, 2019
HSUS reports Dow/Corteva announced it ended the one-year pesticide test, six days after the video release.
Mar 19, 2019
Fortune reports on the corporate reversal. Petition exceeds 310,000 signatures. Corteva confirms Brazil’s ANVISA will accept a waiver.
Late Mar 2019
HSUS announces beagles will be transferred to Michigan Humane Society for rehabilitation and adoption.
Apr 9–10, 2019
Beagles arrive at Michigan Humane. FOX 2 Detroit covers the arrival and assessment/adoption pipeline.
Apr 23, 2019
Adoption stories begin. Local media reports "32 beagles rescued" — creating the unresolved 36 vs. 32 discrepancy.

Pesticide Testing Ended

The sponsor (Dow AgroSciences/Corteva) ended the one-year pesticide test within days of the video release. In a Twitter-posted statement, Corteva said it received confirmation from Brazil's regulator — Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) — that animal pesticide testing would no longer be required, and therefore the study would end.

HSUS characterized the one-year dog test as scientifically unnecessary, noting that the U.S. had eliminated it as a requirement more than a decade earlier. The specific dispute centered on international expectations — Brazil in particular — not U.S. domestic regulatory needs.

Beagles Released for Adoption

HSUS reported it “convinced” the company to release the beagles to Michigan Humane Society for preparation and adoption. The shelter plan included behavioral assessments (dogs were not used to leashes or the outdoors), independent veterinary assessments, and likely foster placement, supported by an HSUS grant.

Methodology Caveat
Public sources consistently report 36 beagles in the pesticide study but 32 placed for adoption. No clean reconciliation of this discrepancy appears in retrieved sources — whether 4 died, were removed, or were otherwise excluded before transfer is not documented.

The Paredox Trade-Secrets Lawsuit

In March 2020, STAT reported that biotech client Paredox Therapeutics filed a lawsuit accusing Charles River of allowing confidential trade secrets to be disseminated after the HSUS undercover agent filmed dog experiments and publicized them online. The suit alleged screening and supervision failures that permitted unauthorized access to highly confidential procedures.

The case was filed as Paredox Therapeutics, LLC v. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. et al, case number 1:20-cv-10464 (District of Massachusetts), before Judge Indira Talwani.

HSUS's 2019 materials had explicitly named Paredox among the companies whose dog experiments were shown in the video, including footage of a beagle named “Harvey” used in a Paredox-sponsored study.

Data Gap
The final disposition of this case (settled, dismissed, or decided) was not retrieved in accessible court filings. Only secondary reporting and a paywalled case stub were located. Therefore, no specific legal precedent can be responsibly attributed to the case.

Charles River's Response

After the video release, Charles River issued a statement asserting that it follows federal laws and international standards and operates “consistent with” a commitment to animal welfare and ethical treatment — framing its responsibilities as both animal care and scientific research stewardship.

No public, detailed description of specific post-investigation changes to hiring or security screening at the Mattawan site was found in retrieved sources. Charles River later acquired MPI Research (the Mattawan campus operator) for approximately $800 million in early 2018, expanding its early-stage CRO capabilities. The company now reports quarterly revenue around $1 billion, consistent with approximately $4 billion in annual revenue.

Charles River's CHARTER program (Commitment to Humane Animal Research Through Excellence and Responsibility) predates the investigation, having been established in 2009. In 2023, the company established an Office for Responsible Animal Use (ORAU) and adopted a “4Rs” framework: Replacement, Reduction, Refinement, plus Responsibility.

Pesticide Dog Testing: Policy Context

Prior to October 2007, EPA required both 13-week and 1-year beagle dog studies for pesticide registration. An EPA-authored retrospective analysis concluded the 1-year requirement should be eliminated, and the U.S. dropped it.

However, a 2024 EPA policy document notes that while many statutes allow flexibility to incorporate New Approach Methods (NAMs), vertebrate testing is still mandated for certain pesticide evaluations in Title 40 CFR. Animal testing requirements for pesticides have not been fully eliminated and remain embedded in parts of the regulatory framework — particularly for international registration where other countries' requirements (like Brazil's pre-2019 stance) can force additional studies.

Key Unknowns

Data Gap
  • Infiltration pathway: Whether the investigator was hired as an animal technician, support staff, or another role is not stated in public sources.
  • 36 vs. 32 discrepancy: Which beagles were excluded before transfer and why — deaths, removals, or other reasons — is not documented.
  • USDA enforcement: Specific inspection findings or citations tied to the investigation period were not retrieved from USDA primary documents.
  • Paredox lawsuit outcome: Final disposition unknown in public sources.
  • First CRL investigation? Whether this was the first undercover investigation at a Charles River facility is not confirmed.

Related Pages